Pakistan had realised that a nuclear exchange was not a one-sided game and that even a demonstration strike by them would be retaliated against. The troop build-up signalled “India’s seriousness” to the international community and the USA. This is an aspect that requires emphasis lest commentary in the manner urged in the book suggest that the government is oblivious to strategic considerations that ought to be the sole preserve of the professional military. This is best summed up by an extract of the Army? All leave was cancelled and the soldiers re-called for active duty. The Causes and Consequences of the Kargil Conflict 1st ed. Vajpayee ended up practising coercive non-diplomacy.
|License:||For Personal Use Only|
|iPhone 5, 5S resolutions||640×1136|
|iPhone 6, 6S resolutions||750×1334|
|iPhone 7, 7 Plus, 8, 8 Plus resolutions||1080×1920|
|Android Mobiles HD resolutions||360×640, 540×960, 720×1280|
|Android Mobiles Full HD resolutions||1080×1920|
|Mobiles HD resolutions||480×800, 768×1280|
|Mobiles QHD, iPhone X resolutions||1440×2560|
|HD resolutions||1280×720, 1366×768, 1600×900, 1920×1080, 2560×1440, Original|
The battle canvas planned for June was larger than the one oprration in January. Vajpayee though skeptic of the seriousness of Musharraf’s pledges, decided not to carry out the military attack planned for January Retrieved 30 December Lack of political will was again demonstrated after the terror strikes in Mumbai on November 26,despite credible evidence that these had been launched by the LeT at the behest of the Pakistani army and the ISI.
India reviewed its nuclear capability to strike back. The tenor of statements published in the Indian press and intelligence information collected, pointed to an imminent invasion by India. The CCS had weighed in the possibility of Pakistan launching an all-out offensive as a response to the Indian strikes.
2001–02 India–Pakistan standoff
Pakistan picked up the war signals and began mobilisation of its military and initiated diplomatic talks with the US President George W. Timeline of the Kashmir conflict — —present.
But the significance of the attack on the Indian Parliament and the Legislative Assembly in Jammu and Kashmir does not resonate in Pakistan. The lack of coherent politico-military decision-making was clearly evident.
–02 India–Pakistan standoff – Wikipedia
However, the troops had no way of knowing that the national aim was to practice coercive diplomacy. A full-frontal invasion would have translated into war. This brings one to the aspect of political operaton.
This military article about the Indian Armed Forces is a stub. The terrorist incident again revived the chance of a full blown war. The then Vice Chief is quoted as saying: On 20 December, amid calls from the United StatesRussiaand the United Nations to exercise restraint, India mobilised and deployed its troops to Kashmir and the Indian part of the Punjab in what was India’s paakram military mobilization since the conflict.
Perhaps the most important lesson emerging from the standoff was the inordinately long time that strike corps needed to mobilise for operationn.
Operation Parakram: The war that wasn’t but could have reined in Pakistan
Operation Parakram, launched in the wake of the December 13, terrorist attack on Parliament, was the first full-scale mobilisation since the Indo-Pak war. We are only told of the Indian Army? The Chiefs were asked to consider the matter and confirm when they would be ready.
Between the three branches of India’s defence forces, the army was serious about going to war, but the Navy and Air Force did not think war would take place.
He strongly disagreed with Maj Gen Mehta’s views on decision-making in the CCS and claimed that there was a unanimity of views parakdam the defence forces. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. This time the mobilisation was total.
The book rightly criticizes the government for not informing the military of the reasons for the mobilization; this was therefore amenable to a permissive interpretation, evident from the contretemps surrounding the dismissal of a strike corps commander for overstepping his non-existent brief.
The Causes and Consequences of the Kargil Conflict 1st ed. In o;eration context of the December 13 attacks, Operation Parakram was India’s way of telling Pakistan that it had crossed the threshold. Apart from Musharraf’s operatkon there was another factor that postponed the CCS plans of an immediate war. The doctrine predates Pokhran and Chagai, but it does not appear to have been revised in the age of? The Indian plans were strengthened by a strong economy with low inflation, operatkon petroleum and forex reserves.
Was it the dithering government with no strategic vision? He for the first time condemned the attack on Parliament as a terrorist attack and compared it with the September 11 attacks.
India backed-off, but troops remained in place in their deployment areas on the international border IB and the three strike corps remained poised in paraoram concentration areas.